Since 2005, dual representation is only possible through Intermediary process, instead of Dual Agency.

Since 2005, dual representation is only possible through Intermediary process, instead of Dual Agency.

• A. FALSE
• B. TRUE
• C. Sometimes
• D. Never

Answer: (B)

The main idea here is how representing both parties in one transaction is handled in real estate practice. In many states, having one licensee represent both the buyer and the seller (dual agency) is restricted or avoided because it creates conflicts of interest. To allow both sides to be represented without that conflict, the intermediary arrangement is used. In this setup, the broker remains neutral and appoints separate licensees to represent each party, with written consent and rules to protect confidentiality and fair treatment. Because of these regulatory shifts, representing both sides is typically done through the Intermediary process rather than as a single Dual Agency arrangement. That’s why the statement is considered true. The other options don’t fit because they’d imply different, less consistent rules about how dual representation can occur.

The main idea here is how representing both parties in one transaction is handled in real estate practice. In many states, having one licensee represent both the buyer and the seller (dual agency) is restricted or avoided because it creates conflicts of interest. To allow both sides to be represented without that conflict, the intermediary arrangement is used. In this setup, the broker remains neutral and appoints separate licensees to represent each party, with written consent and rules to protect confidentiality and fair treatment.

Because of these regulatory shifts, representing both sides is typically done through the Intermediary process rather than as a single Dual Agency arrangement. That’s why the statement is considered true. The other options don’t fit because they’d imply different, less consistent rules about how dual representation can occur.